<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hi, I&#039;m Nate Radebaugh.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naterad.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naterad.com/blog</link>
	<description>this is my blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 06:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Difference Between &#8220;Droid&#8221; and &#8220;Android&#8221; by Nate</title>
		<link>http://naterad.com/blog/2010/03/14/the-difference-between-droid-and-android/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 06:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naterad.com/blog/?p=76#comment-17</guid>
		<description>You bring up a good point. Much has changed since my original post. In short, the only &quot;Droid&quot; devices you will see are owned by Verizon. Verizon has the licenses with Lucas Films that allow them to use the term &quot;droid&quot;.

The Motorola Droid was the first android phone marketed heavily by Verizon as a Droid. At the time that I wrote this article, the Moto Droid was the &lt;b&gt;only&lt;/b&gt; Droid on the market. However, now days Verizon has many android devices, all under the &quot;Droid&quot; family, such as the Droid, Droid 2, Droid Eris, Droid Incredible, Droid X, Droid Pro, and Droid Charge.

While the Samsung Charge may be &quot;the first Droid to be infused with 4G LTE power,&quot; it is not the first &lt;b&gt;android&lt;/b&gt; device to utilize 4G. In fact, Verizon Wireless marketed the HTC Thunderbolt as their first 4G LTE device altogether, so perhaps they do not consider the Thunderbolt in their &quot;droid&quot; family.

T-Mobile had devices on their own 4G HSPA+ network much earlier than Verizon (myTouch 4G). Similarly, Sprint has been boasting their 4G Clear network even before T-Mobile (HTC Evo).

All 4G networks are not created equal, but both the HTC Thundebolt and the Samsung Charge use Verizon&#039;s same 4G LTE network, so you can expect them to perform on the internet equally fast. &lt;b&gt;The difference is merely for marketing.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up a good point. Much has changed since my original post. In short, the only &#8220;Droid&#8221; devices you will see are owned by Verizon. Verizon has the licenses with Lucas Films that allow them to use the term &#8220;droid&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Motorola Droid was the first android phone marketed heavily by Verizon as a Droid. At the time that I wrote this article, the Moto Droid was the <b>only</b> Droid on the market. However, now days Verizon has many android devices, all under the &#8220;Droid&#8221; family, such as the Droid, Droid 2, Droid Eris, Droid Incredible, Droid X, Droid Pro, and Droid Charge.</p>
<p>While the Samsung Charge may be &#8220;the first Droid to be infused with 4G LTE power,&#8221; it is not the first <b>android</b> device to utilize 4G. In fact, Verizon Wireless marketed the HTC Thunderbolt as their first 4G LTE device altogether, so perhaps they do not consider the Thunderbolt in their &#8220;droid&#8221; family.</p>
<p>T-Mobile had devices on their own 4G HSPA+ network much earlier than Verizon (myTouch 4G). Similarly, Sprint has been boasting their 4G Clear network even before T-Mobile (HTC Evo).</p>
<p>All 4G networks are not created equal, but both the HTC Thundebolt and the Samsung Charge use Verizon&#8217;s same 4G LTE network, so you can expect them to perform on the internet equally fast. <b>The difference is merely for marketing.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Difference Between &#8220;Droid&#8221; and &#8220;Android&#8221; by lild304</title>
		<link>http://naterad.com/blog/2010/03/14/the-difference-between-droid-and-android/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>lild304</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 01:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naterad.com/blog/?p=76#comment-16</guid>
		<description>So, I know this is a year later. I&#039;m confused. Your article seems to suggest what I thought... the Droid name is a Motorola brand. I just saw a Samsung Charge commercial using the red eye and the Droid &#039;sound byte&#039; claiming that the Charge is &quot;the first Droid to be infused with 4G LTE power.&quot; It has always been my understanding that Droid was Moto&#039;s brand and the Thunderbolt(my current phone) was the first 4G LTE phone which also happens to be an Android. I feel like I&#039;m missing something in the branding story but I don&#039;t know what. Did something happen between Moto and Samsung that I haven&#039;t heard about? Other&#039;s have suggested that Droid is a Verizon brand but I have a hard time believing that. Thank you for any info you might have!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I know this is a year later. I&#8217;m confused. Your article seems to suggest what I thought&#8230; the Droid name is a Motorola brand. I just saw a Samsung Charge commercial using the red eye and the Droid &#8216;sound byte&#8217; claiming that the Charge is &#8220;the first Droid to be infused with 4G LTE power.&#8221; It has always been my understanding that Droid was Moto&#8217;s brand and the Thunderbolt(my current phone) was the first 4G LTE phone which also happens to be an Android. I feel like I&#8217;m missing something in the branding story but I don&#8217;t know what. Did something happen between Moto and Samsung that I haven&#8217;t heard about? Other&#8217;s have suggested that Droid is a Verizon brand but I have a hard time believing that. Thank you for any info you might have!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Difference Between &#8220;Droid&#8221; and &#8220;Android&#8221; by jclamp</title>
		<link>http://naterad.com/blog/2010/03/14/the-difference-between-droid-and-android/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>jclamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naterad.com/blog/?p=76#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thank you for clearing that up :) I needed to Google just to ensure that someone had established this. It&#039;s an important matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for clearing that up <img src='http://naterad.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I needed to Google just to ensure that someone had established this. It&#8217;s an important matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trail Mix by stephradz</title>
		<link>http://naterad.com/blog/2008/01/02/trail-mix/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>stephradz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naterad.com/blog/?p=13#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Yum is right. 

I can think of another combination, however, that is just as &quot;pleasure inducing.&quot;

Curds and whey!

Mother Goose is truly brilliant:

Little Miss Muffet
Sat on a tuffet,
Eating her curds and whey.
Along came a spider
Who sat down beside her
And frightened Miss Muffet away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yum is right. </p>
<p>I can think of another combination, however, that is just as &#8220;pleasure inducing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Curds and whey!</p>
<p>Mother Goose is truly brilliant:</p>
<p>Little Miss Muffet<br />
Sat on a tuffet,<br />
Eating her curds and whey.<br />
Along came a spider<br />
Who sat down beside her<br />
And frightened Miss Muffet away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

